Saturday, January 14, 2012

ALEKS $24,528.00 Purchase: Choice or Mandate?

Someone rightly asked yesterday, twice, why was the focus on Washington's school purchasing proposal of a $22,560 licence to use a reading program and not on the other program, ALEKS, which is also part of last Tuesday's BOE agenda.

The main reason is because there was a salesman presentation on the $22,560 reading program. The next reason is because a school board member raised questions and shared the concern about not having been presented with a document that showed how the program will be implemented at Washington school. This is a very valid concern that should be resolved before the school board is requested to vote on this, and any other item that lacks documentation on how the plan was selected, what is the purpose of it, what data was taken into consideration and a whole lot more.

As for ALEKS goes, there was no real discussion of the item. No one raised questions of concern. And to be perfectly honest this is the first time that I witness a school board member asking questions on implementation and requesting to have the information in writing. And aside from Genesis, it never occurred to me that the school board was voting on oral information on instructional programs. Now we know.

But let's look at ALEKS, which also should had come with an implementation plan and a full report on how and why the Bilingual Department selected this program. Did it?

ALEKS (Assessment and Learning in Knowledge Spaces) – Online Mathematics Solutions is also a one-year license to access ALEKS on line. The price is $24,528.00. The program, as per the agenda (p.24), will be targeted to students from 3 to 12 grades at 10 schools, access seems to be limited to ESL students as the agenda says the access will be granted to 584 students.

The number of students raised a question in my mind:

Is ALEKS part of the district's response to the Civil Rights's complaint that was filed against the district for not providing adequate education to ESL students to an specific number of students last year?

If you have not read the Civil Rights Settlement between the Plainfield school district and the federal Office of Civil Rights you can read it HERE.

With this said, if this the case, and I am just speculating, then this is the reason why ALEKS is purchased for just 584 students. The purchase of ALEKS then is not a choice, but a mandate.

If a mandate, then ALEKS would have to had been approved by the Office of Civil Rights as part of the settlement between the district and the Office of Civil Rights. (We will know what was approved or not once documents arrive via a FOIA, not an OPRA:-)

If not a mandate, then hopefully the school board knows why only 584 students will receive access to this program. And hopefully there is more than an empty resolution to explain this purchase. To learn more about ALEKS click HERE.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

"If you have not read the Civil Rights Settlement between the Plainfield school district and the federal Office of Civil Rights you can read it HERE: http://goo.gl/H5rlT

***** Whaaaaat??? *****
The district had to be MADE to do a ton of things so as not to be sued for Civil Rights issues regarding bilingual students...little children's civil rights???

Oh, no...this PPS Board and Administration(every last one of them) MUST GO!!!!

We pay them RIDICULOUS salaries to HELP ALL kids; Not to violate children's civil rights and get the district sued!!!

So just from Maria's Blog INFO we have problems/concerns/questions with:
1. Kindergarten Classes
2. Autistic Classes!!
3. Bilingual Classes & CIVIL RIGHTS!!
4. OPRA
5. Technology Purchases
6. Communication regarding safety at sporting events
7. Interviews for employees applying for district posting
8. Application processes at Arts HS
9. Gaps in Regulation documentation
10. Transparent and DOCUMENTED Purchasing Procedures
11. Concerned PARENTS BEING IGNORED by the board and administration

This might be a good time for administrators to retire.

BTW, Maria, when is the next BOE meeting where parents can speak? That better be a standing-room only crowd.

PPS Administrators MUST GO!!!

Anonymous said...

January 17, 2012: Plainfield Board of Education Business Meeting: 8:00PM Plainfield High School Auditorium

We really should distribute information about "Maria's Blog," so that the people who attend the meeting can network with us...Strength in Numbers!

BTW, is anyone taping the meeting for public distribution & further discussion?

Bob said...

Plainfield's education system is a mess and it doesn't seem to be getting better. Maybe we should just do away with the BOE and Superintendent and we'd be better off. I don't know if we need a Bored of Education in Plainfield any more.