--------Thank you Maria for the opportunity to share information about the meeting.
Cedarbrook had the largest group of people out, one parent was from Emerson and
one parent was from PAAS PTA's. There was a presentation by the Superintendent,
then an activity was done in a group break out session, that was geared towards
what our ideas and thoughts were about reconfiguration. There wasn't any
particular plans that was revealed. Parents did press to get the Superintendent
to state when changes would occur.Mrs. Pyles stated there would be a recommendation at the January board meeting and the Board of Education would have to vote on the recommendation that she presents. The recommendation would probably go into effect in September if the BOE agrees with the recommendation of the Superintendent. There were many valuable points that came up from the passionate parents. The points are as follows:
* Parents really don't want their children in the middle schools. (Mr. Asante) Principal of Hubbard asked why and invited parents to visit the school and he was open to hear the parents suggestions.
*Curriculum is the real issue, Why hasn't it been fixed?
*Preception is key, Plainfield needs to do more about getting the positive news out about the success of our children.
*Plainfield should concentrate on the particular schools with the over population problem and serious curriculum problems, the other schools shouldn't be involved.
*Genesis still isn't being utilized to it's maximum potiental.
*Parents are willing to send their children to private school, rather than sending them to the mediocre charter and failing middle schools.
*Kudos to the Superintendent for staying very late and listening to the parents concerns.
--------I attended PPS configuration meeting and although there was a presentation and discussion regarding the configuration. The parents were not taken the interim-superintendent reasoning as good enough. At the end of the day most parents don't want their children to go to the middle schools regardless of overcrowding or not. The same question kept coming up regarding verifying children true school location. The complaint from many parents was that there are children from other areas or towns which do not correspond with school attend. Ex. someone living on the west side of Plainfield attending Cook or the east or the opposite. Another thing which came up was with schools that have a K-8 the curriculum for the upper grades does not provide enough diversity or challenges. My feeling is if the BOE decides to move forward with this plan there more problems which will develop. 1. All schools which have K-8 will increase in student body or parents will either send their kids to charater or private schools still leaving the current middle schools with low enrollment. One parent suggest that all the schools be reconfigured equally on both the east and side as well as the high school which would provide the community with
better student to teacher ratios and a even playing field for our students. Nothing has been finalized but it clear that some decision will be made hopefully more thoughtful than the principal relocation.
I also attended the meeting and heard the same thing reported here - no middle school interest from parents, "fix only the school's that were overcrowded not the ones that work", and why was this done by the previous superintendent when there was no thought into how crowded it would make some schools. The group work was helpful as our group was made up of parents from Cook, Cedarbrook, Emerson, a teacher and coach from one of the schools, and a school principal (Jefferson). What was clear from that discussion is that there are many considerations
involved in this discussion from a parents, neighborhood, and schools
perspective. Parents need to feel that their children are getting a quality
education and schools need to have the space, class sizes, and resources to meet the needs of the students they serve. I thought the superintendent did a great job answering questions and being very accessible during this meeting. More meetings should be structred this way.
------
I agree that although there is discussion regarding this problem the solutions is not going to make any one parent truly happy. The middle schools in Plainfield have not had a very good reputation. Although Plainfield is diverse regarding race and culture there is not much of that diversity shown throughout the district schools. Which again says very loudly that until the PPS provide the quality of education they are looking for more and more parents will be sending their children outside of the district either after 5th, 6th or 8th if their school goes to that level. During the meeting it was mentioned that the conversion was tried before with no real success so why was it push again a few years ago? Now due to overcrowding they want to go back to the old format which doesn't address the real problem. Why do parent feel so uncomfortable with the middle schools. Over the past few years every school has shown lower AYP scores and NJASK scores which again brings to mind what is missing from this equation?
We know whatever school is doing well more parents will try to get their children in there. What also needs to be done is a plan which incorporates the successes from every school to create a model which could be use to bring the district forward. We also need to enforce student location zoned for their school. Too many students are attending schools which they are not zoned for.
--------
3 comments:
I have to say I am disappointed the focus is still on the zoning issue here. My children attend a school they are not zoned for because legally under the no child left behindd law
they are entitled to an education at a school that has made ayp and not deemed in adequate. I am an involved parent at the school attend boe meetings when i can and my children is thrviing in the most culturally diverse siccesful.school in the
district. I pay 9200 in property taxes and feel that we are a positive influence on the student body where we attend. If i am forced to into an overcrowded non.diverse situation where my children suffer i will be very unhappy and will seek legal council
Thank you 11:49 AM for clarifying that students who reside outside a particular school's district is legally eligible to attend a successful school "School of Choice" under the No Child Left Behind law.
I also want to point to a previous poster that AYP and NJASK are not two separate tests. AYP (Annual Yearly Progress) is measured by the NJASK test. As for the NJASK scores dropping over the past few years, I don't know if that is really the case. What I do know is that the bar for making AYP was raised a few years ago. Therefore, some schools that were making AYP before the change in the cut-off levels were not making AYP after the change even if their scores rose or stayed the same. In other words, a school's status as making AYP may have changed even if test scores did not.
As for school configuration, it is clear that no parents showed up to ask for an expansion of the old middle school model. As much as administrators try to push it, nobody is buying it. Visiting the middle schools right now will not tell you anything because they are currently underpopulated. What people remember is what a disaster the middle schools were when they were fully populated. It is clear that Plainfield parents are done with traditional middle schools.
We have to great buildings that can be put to better use. We need to be discussing better ideas for these buildings. We know that parents are clamoring to get into the K-8 Centers and PAAAS. So, why don't we replicate those models and provide more choice.
We know that PAAAS is going to run out of space as it moves towards full implementation to twelfth grade. I suggest that PAAAS be moved to the Hubbard building so that it can grow to full fruition.
Moving PAAAS would open up space at their current location that can be used to open another K-8 Center or to expand Jefferson School into another K-8 Center.
Maxson School could be converted into a 7-12 Magnet School like PAAAS, but with a different theme. I suggest that the theme be Science with concentrations in Engineering as well as Health Sciences.
I think that if we run the numbers, this configuration will help alleviate overcrowding as well as provide parents more positive choice within our school district.
We need to move away from complaining about the past. Lets move forward and debate ideas on how to move forward. I invite people to provide feedback on my ideas. I would also like to hear other peoples ideas about how to give the community what we want and need.
Thanks Maria for providing this space for discussion on this very important issue.
11:49,
NCLB rules have come to complicate matters for districts such as Plainfield where multiple schools don't reach AYP, but I would be interested to learn how the district handles this kind of transfers: Do you just move your child to a "Choice School" or is there paperwork to be filed out? Are there any conditions attached to this kind of transferring? If you have any answers it will be appreciate it by all of us that wish to learn how this federal regulation gets implemented here in Plainfield. Thanks!
1:22,
Good ideas, and it seems this is a push that has been happening for a while since I remember a name was suggested for this Science/Engineering Middle School, by a school board member earlier this year. Keep telling us more about your vision. I also have a question:
Can the 2012 restructuring plans for both middle schools, Maxson and Hubbard, be changed when they only were put in place this summer?
And THANK YOU All for providing more food for thought. I hope more people join this "virtual exchange of ideas and concerns" when it comes to our city's schools.
Post a Comment